War Brings Peace

First M . Last Name Professor s Name Class and Number 7 February 2007 Can strugglef ar Bring slumber ? War is considered as a particular branch of a specific school of thought , with Carl von Clausewitz being considered as the only philosopher of war stated in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy . It to a fault says that it refers to , a phenomenon which occurs only between political communities or certain political pressure groups , like terrorist organizations , might also be considered political communities in that they are associations of people with a political purpose (Stanford ,War , 2005 . On the some other hand , public security treaty is the pursuit of justice with opposite methods of human diversity and who seek peace are more or less responsible for social changes in visionary ways , while the proponents of war are considered to be narrow minded with one thing in mind to win something they neediness , using whatever methods they need to accomplish this . Reli gion has been blamed as the cause of many wars , merely they considered themselves to be an advocacy for non-violence . A source of conflict ,religion is also a philosophy and practitioner of peace . Contradictory in itself , this explains the conflicting views bringing war into existence .Not all wars are caused by opposing religious views , but the majority of them are . Jenny Teichman wrote in The Philosophy of War and Peace that Aggressive wars have often been waged for religious reasons and still are today (Teichman , 2002 , pg . 2 . According to black lovage Mosley in Philosophy of War , man cannot stop war it is his nature to wage war which backs my possible action that war is the product of man s ideas and hence is a product of choice . We fight for peace through war , and war continues on until peace comes into beingthese are contradictory statements .Peace piece through war is not peace , only a win-win plaza , or a give-in situation at the cost of lives , money , a nd and power win Man chooses war , and by this is meant that each soulfulness participant chooses war (or has to choose differently , if war is thrust upon him through invasion or muster Mosley also states that , The soulfulness is a volitional being , whose cognition is free to use and direct and in group activity such as a battle , each individual must sacrifice his thought and effort even if only accepting the orders of others (Mosley , pg . 39 . Does this refer to the desire for peace merely . It refers to the fact many are at war through the desires of others for ulterior gain that has nothing to do with achieving peace . There is nothing unlawful with different views they are only different ,with each individual thinking their viewpoint is the correct one -unfortunately , many feel their way is correct for absolutely everyone with everyone else wrong or evil . To sum it up , how each one goes about getting their way is what sets the paroxysm for war or peace one may collectedly go about it with diplomatic and peaceful ways , such as